How to Choose the Doctrine
      CW30_No.55
      The Buddhist Yogi C. M. Chen
      
        There are seven conditions to be gathered which help one choose the
right doctrine and teaching to follow and practice. I will first give a
brief outline of these conditions and then give more details about each. 
      The first condition is that you must know the Dharma. Because we are
        Buddhists we practice Buddhist Dharma so it is this Dharma we must know
        and choose. The second condition is that you must know yourself. Every
        person thinks he knows himself, but actually he does not know himself very
        well. To know yourself means you must know the position you stand in; are
        you a Bodhisattva, just a Buddhist, a combination of things, just a man
        or partly of some animal nature? You must know yourself quite well then
        you will know how to choose the teaching. You must also know to what degree
        is your accomplishment, your knowledge and your wisdom. Everybody thinks
        himself very wise, merciful and kind, but actually is he really like this.
        You have to reflect very seriously upon what you really are. Knowing yourself,
        you must know your involvement, your nation, your state, and all your customs.
        To know how to practice, you have to know yourself. This is the second
        condition. The third condition is that you must know the contradictory
        opposite sides of the teachings as well as the one side, and how to resolve
        and distinguish the two. The fourth condition is to know how to seize the
        opportunity and chance to work with the teaching. Is this the right chance
        to teach him or talk to him, is this the time to advise him? All this you
        must know. The fifth condition is that you must know others, you must know
        mankind. First you must know yourself, but you must also know others. This
        is because we do not practice alone but are always connected with others,
        so you must know about those others quite well. The sixth condition is
        to know about time, what is the right time for practising this, is this
        the right time to practice that. You must know about the correct order,
        sequence, and time for the teachings. The seventh and last condition is
        to know all the vinayas, what is this vinaya, what is that vinaya, is this
        action fixed by this vinaya, or does this break that vinaya. This you must
        know. If all these seven conditions are known quite well by you, then you
        will know how to choose the teaching. 
      
      I. Know the Dharma
      First let me talk about knowing the Dharma. For example, suppose we
        are just starting to practice impermanence. To practice impermanence does
        not involve eating, although some Tibetan lamas have said: "You must know
        impermanence, today you have to eat, otherwise tomorrow you will die. So
        today you must take enough of this very good meat for everything is impermanent."
        This is not the Dharma. Some people say, "Oh, I must practice impermanence
        so I have to sell my car and make many kinds of plans to gather enough
        money to allow me to practice for three years in a cave. I must take care
        of these money matters first, then I can practice impermanence." This may
        seem quite reasonable but it is not really impermanence. To really practice
        impermanence you must not take care of even tomorrow's rice. My guru whose
        name was Wu Jin Yee Shi so nicely realized impermanence. When I remember
        him I just cry. At that time he was about 50 years old. Every day whenever
        he received anything he just gave it to others. He said, "Tomorrow I will
        die, so I just give, give." Actually many tomorrows came and he did not
        die. His foolish disciples said, "Tomorrow you may die, but tomorrow there
        will not be even any rice, so we have to arrange for it". I said, "No,
        this is the Guru's really good renunciation." This Guru died through trouble
        by his students. He foreknew he would die in seven days and told his students,
  "I will prepare a seven days meditation and during these seven days I need
        not even one day's meal, I just meditate. My deep breathing can support
        me in my life, so don't knock on my door." But these students did not take
        his advice. After three days they said, "Our Guru has not received food
        for three days and will die. What shall we do? We must see what has happened."
        When they opened his door, he stopped his meditation and immediately died.
        But he died four days before he should have so those students really killed
        him. He had already dissolved most of his body but if he still had four
        more days of quiet meditation without being disturbed, he would have been
        fully dissolved and attained full Enlightenment. His whole body just remained
        a height like the length from his wrist to elbow. His disciples with one
        hand brought what was left for me to see. I felt very sad that the students
        were so bad. That is why I do not want to have students, for students like
        those can kill the teacher. Surely there are many gurus who do have students
        and they do not feel the danger but I have seen such actions. There are
        very few such lamas any more as Wu Jin Yee Shi. He always told his disciples
        if anything was given to him to send it away for he did not want anything
        for tomorrow as he never thought about tomorrow. 
      If you have long plans to use your car and do this and that, this is
        not impermanence. Impermanence is not three years or five years away, impermanence
        means soon you will die so you can not prepare anything but just prepare
        to die. I am sorry about even myself, with so many books, so much of this
        and that to do. I said that twelve days later I will send a Dragon Bottle,
        but actually this is not practising impermanence. How can you guarantee
        you have twelve more days? You must just strictly practice impermanence
        according to the Dharma. 
      Once a Tibetan Guru came to India. The Indian Guru asked him, "Very
        important is to practice impermanence. After this what shall I do?" "If
        you really practise impermanence, how can there be something to do after
        this? You should not ask this question. There is just impermanence!" To
        practice impermanence strictly is just like this. You must follow the Dharma,
        not follow worldly things. To prepare your car is a worldly thing, to prepare
        food is a worldly thing, not the Dharma. For impermanence this moment is
        here, the second moment you use to diligently practice, nothing else can
        be involved. Once a guru lived in a cave and practiced many things including
        the impermanence foundation. He went out to urinate and his robe caught
        upon a thorn. He wanted to disentangle it, for a long time he tried, and
        then he thought of Impermanence! He just pulled his robe away and did not
        mind that he tore it. He urinated quickly and went inside to practice again.
        This is real diligence. Real practice is to just renounce and diligently
        practice the Dharma. You must know the Dharma. Impermanence is for the
        Dharma; one must not waste even a moment because we are dying so we have
        to utilize every moment, continue to use, use, then if death has not come,
        the Dharma will come. 
      Do not choose by thinking, "Oh, impermanence. I must take food today
        and tonight have enough sexual intercourse with my wife for there may be
        no next night." This we should not choose. We must choose only the Dharma.
        Do not plan for any kind of worldly things, even if only rice. This must
        be extremely seriously done like this. 
      You must know all about the Dharma, the what-so-called ordinary Dharma
        and extraordinary Dharma. Suppose your friend asks you for help and you
        say that Mr. Chen's teachings say don't try to cure other's diseases. But
        my book said this only in reference to the extraordinary Dharma in the
        Tantra when you treat yourself as in a Tantric hermitage and you diligently
        do certain meditations of Samadhi. Then you should not stop such practice
        for the ordinary case Dharma. For the ordinary case, when somebody comes
        who is in pain, surely you must help him. This is quite right for a person
        practicing Mahayana. Suppose you are not yet in a Tantric hermitage and
        you have the chance to help another but do not try to cure his disease.
        This mistakes the Mahayana Dharma as the Tantric Dharma. In the Mahayana,
        a Bodhisattva uses many kalpas to become Buddha so he has many lifetimes
        to become a man and to do good and lure people to believe in Buddhism.
        If you are now trying to practice Dharma but you have a job, and have not
        perfectly renounced, then you should do some healing if you can. If you
        are in a Tantric hermitage and are practising the high doctrine, at that
        time you have no time to do such temporary things. So you must know what
        Dharma is temporary, what Dharma is eternal, what Dharma is profound, and
        what Dharma is not profound, what Dharma is ordinary and what Dharma is
        extraordinary; then you know how to choose the doctrine. 
      It says in my books that if you practice the Tantra in a retreat, you
        must diligently follow just one goal and one practice and must at that
        exact time reach it, so you have no time to do anything else. That is why
        the Tantric practicioner can shorten the three kalpas into one lifetime. 
      We have a fire sacrifice; this outward external fire sacrifice is one
        kind of sacrifice. There is also an inner fire sacrifice we can practice
        with Tumo as the fire altar, with our two hands as the two offering handles,
        with food as offerings. And again we can utilize our whole life as a fire
        sacrifice to do something for others. But for all of these you must know
        the exact Dharma. When you get food in a restaurant you can at that time
        think and use this inner sacrifice. When you get some money, you should
        put it into the outward fire sacrifice. Do not say, "Oh, I have already
        performed a fire sacrifice just with my belly." In India I met a naked
        Yogi who came and asked for money. I said, "Please tell me who is your
        Yidom, is it Shiva or Krishna?" He replied: "Belly, belly!" This is his
        fire sacrifice! 
      Christians sometimes say, I am just like Jesus, I used my whole lifetime
        to do something good, so I have no need of such an external sacrifice,
        I need not give money for a sacrifice, because my whole lifetime has been
        a sacrifice. Actually to say this you must know that your level of practice
        is really the same as that of Jesus or Saint Francis who had no need of
        such things. When I was in a cave, I had no incense to burn but when I
        went outside and had money, I bought incense. We must really do whatever
        we can for the Dharma. You must not protect your money under the pretext
        of saying "Oh, I sacrifice my whole life so I need not buy candles", for
        you really have not sacrificed your whole lifetime. Actually your whole
        lifetime is just for your family, for this boy or girl, for eating, for
        picture, or anything else, but not really just for God's will. If you do
        not choose the teaching according to the Dharma, you can not choose rightly
        and properly. So we must know the Dharma very well. 
      Suppose we say we practice the non-self, non-egoism of the personality.
        We must also know the Dharma of non-egoism in Mahayana which is both non-egoism
        of personality and non-egoism of Dharma. We must know further the Tantra
        non-egoism which is also different. The Tantra is not only personality
        non-egoism and Dharma non-egoism, but also non-egoism of the five poisons.
        You must know these differences and then you can know how to practice in
        proper sequence. 
      There is a story: A monk sent his disciple to bring a letter to another
        monk. The monk told this disciple he would have to make a four-five day
        journey by foot as there were no post offices at that time. He instructed
        him, "You must be careful and remember that you have an umbrella, remember
        that is one, you have the letter, very important, this is two, you have
        a rice basket, this is three, you have straw sandals, that is four, and
        yourself is five altogether. You must be careful to stop early at a hotel
        and leave early in the morning. Don't forget yourself, don't forget all
        these five things." So the disciple left and the next morning before resuming
        his journey he counted all his things. "My Guru said I have five things,
        but today I count only four. My sandals are here, the umbrella is here,
        the letter is here, the basket is here, but where is the fifth? Oh, I have
        to go back to ask my Guru, I have only four. But I did not lose anything!",
        he cried and cried. When he returned the monk said, "You lost what things?"
  "I did not lose anything but I count only four." "Count to me!" "This and
        this and this, the other thing I don't know." "Oh, this is yourself!" The
        student said, "No, you said no self. you always teach me no self, so how
        can I count it?" "But I told you to remember yourself, you are not really
        no self, you still have self. I give you money for self, I give you sandals
        to put your own feet into, all are yourself." "I am sorry, now I know what
        is meant by self, what is meant by non-self." Non-self means you just have
        the non-volition of self. You should not keep the volition of self thinking,
  "I am the student of this Guru, so you must carefully serve me, ask the
        hotel to do this and that." But this your self must take care of the letter. 
      There are so many mistakes on this and even Arhats sometimes have ignorance.
        When Buddha prepared to talk about the non-Dharma self the Arhats were
        very afraid, "Oh, if everything both good and bad is non-self then we may
        hear Buddha talk about evil things, and must not listen!" So you must know
        very well what non-ego means and what is the ego and how to destroy that
        ego self but not all aspects of self. In China there was a monk who did
        not use his name, "Why", I asked him, "do you not use your name?" "If we
        have no name, we have no self so if we do not use our names we will forget
        ourselves." "I don't think so. You do not use your name but when your Guru
        calls your name, you say Ah! Ah! How can you answer if you have no self." 
      What is meant by the non-self is not the self of the name or the self
        of the flesh, of the eyes or ears, but it is the volition of self. Those
        who say, "I am a very good leader, you must follow me" have this kind of
        big volition of self. Ambition is just volition, and the ego causes fighting
        and war. So we do not want that kind of big ego but we want non-ego, while
        we also have some need of the body. It is very difficult to distinguish
        what is the right meaning of the ego. That is why many practitioners of
        the Sunyata do not succeed, do not even find what should be non-ego. 
      Without volition there is no self. If you have volition of self, everything
        is centralized about this self, I should do this, I should do that, I am
        like this, I am like that. So every condition of the flesh and of the consciousness,
        of inside and outside, has such volition, otherwise you could not work,
        but increased volition gives one trouble and makes one's sorrow. That is
        why although we have the same heart, the same body, we live in the same
        America, some people are so happy, some are so sad, some so worried. It
        is based upon the degree of volition of self. It is not based upon the
        body or anything else. So when you know the Dharma you know how to practice
        and how to choose the teaching. 
      
        II. Know Yourself
      So first you must know the Dharma, then you must know yourself. Some
        books say you must renounce, but the sixth patriarch of Ch'an said that
        there is no need to renounce; here is the Buddha, Ch'an is in the world
        and there is no Ch'an out of the world, so why need renounce? Some say
        you must renounce according to Hinayana doctrine, but as you have no self,
        how can I decide whether to renounce or not? What teaching will help me?
        What teaching is not fixed for me? All are teachings. The Ch'an sixth patriarch
        was also a very learned Guru and what he said is not wrong. But some teachings
        of the Buddha say you must renounce this, renounce that, then which should
        we choose? You must know yourself, then you can choose. 
      How to know yourself? That means if you are wise enough, if you have
        Samadhi enough, if your great compassion is enough, if you have destroyed
        your volition of self, if you have no attachment, if you go everywhere,
        just help others and never have selfishness, then you do not need to renounce
        because you have practised everything quite right, you have renounced completely.
        This is the high teaching of the sixth patriarch. If whenever I touch a
        little thing I have attachment, I like all girls, I like any good food,
        all beautiful pictures and entertainment, so that whenever I get anything
        I become attached to it, then I am a person who must renounce. You yourself
        must know, "I am this person, so I must renounce." You know whether you
        have attachments or not, you must not cheat yourself. It is always stated
        that Buddha said, "Have pity on yourself." You must know yourself quite
        well, then you can know how to choose the teaching. You know, "I am such
        a lustful person; I must not go into society; I must renounce for the time
        being." You must think, "I will meditate until my samatha and meditation
        is very strong, my Samdahi is strong and my attachment is all finished,
        then I can go into the world, into society, into the nation and do everything
        for others. But first I must destroy my ego." 
      During the time of intense practice you may have long hair, a long beard
        and dirty clothes as you will not have time to wash them. But this will
        not be an external form which you are attached to as the Hippie culture
        is. Modern girls like the hippie look of long hair and dirty clothes, very
        romantic. This is not renunciation. Actually Han-Shan really renounced,
        that is why he had long hair and a beard. Han-Shan did not care about time
        so he had no clock. But the modern youths come to an airport and ask others
        what time it is as they save money and do not buy a watch, but others become
        their watch. This is not renunciation. When I introduced my friend Charles
        to His Holiness Kalu Rinpoche, I said, "He seems like a Hippie as he has
        long hair and a beard but he is a very good person and does everything
        very diligently and carefully and is not lazy, so don't mistake him because
        of his long hair." 
      You always have to reflect on yourself, what kind of person you are,
        and when you know yourself then you can choose the teaching. If you really
        see every beautiful girl and have no attachment, if you really eat in every
        good restaurant and all taste the same, then you can go everywhere. If
        you can draw back your semen and do everything according to Tantric love,
        then you can go for a massage. If not, you are just an animal spending
        a lot of money and will fall into an animal state. So you must know yourself
        and choose the Dharma which will help you. You must try to change yourself,
        you must make yourself better than before. This goal you must agree to.
        If you agree with this goal, you have to choose according to your own attachemnt
        or detachment. If you have detachment you do not need renunciation. If
        you have attachment you must renounce. This is very clear. 
      So many persons read Buddhist books and are very perplexed by them.
        They seem contradictory to each other so you can not choose which to follow.
        If you know yourself, you know, "Oh, I am not so high a sage; I have to
        renounce; I have to keep a distance." This is especially confusing regarding
        meditation. Some books say a little delusion, never mind, let it be, let
        it go, just like the birds flying into the air, let it go, every day, let
        it go. If all your life you let it go, let it go, then your brain just
        goes the way of deluded mind. "Let it go should not be given this interpretation.
        So many people mistake the Mahamudra teaching and even many false Gurus
        also misunderstand "Let it go." They say we can meditate in action, delusion
        also is mind, delusion also is impermanence. Let it be. But this "let it
        go" is just for practising after you have achieved the Samadhi of Voidness.
        You can only really let go this voidness into the air as a bird in the
        sky when you have nothing inside and have nothing to be an obstacle. So
        first you have to really recognize the Sunyata and really realize the entity
        of brightness of the Mahamudra, then you can let it go, just for this moment,
        let it go. If your self is not in that position, you just feel a mind of
        more delusion and trouble and pain, and many bad dreams and many kinds
        of sorrow come. Therefore, you have to practice Samatha, that means with
        extreme concentration not allowing the deluded mind to come. When it comes,
        draw it back, when it comes again, draw it back again. If you draw it back
        many times, but it still comes, it is better to give up your meditation
        seat and go around the altar, worship, and repeat Amitabha's name. Because
        if you repeat Amitabha's name, Amitabha will hear, some ghost will also
        hear and you will get some merit. If you just meditate on "Let it go",
        what is the use, you get no concentration. 
      For the first stage, a person must not allow the deluded mind. But for
        the sage, for the person who is very good in concentration and also knows
        Sunyata, he can let it go, because he can make the "let it go" function
        in Sunyata itself. Just like a big steamer on a great ocean, the more steadfastly
        the big steamer holds to its direction, that means the goal is right, then
        the more big winds and waves, the quicker it can go. This method is good,
        but if you are on a small pond and your boat has many holes, you have to
        empty the water and then you can slowly, slowly float on the surface. 
      So the beginner must cut off all delusion. That is why I always emphasize
        that Samatha practice is very important. After this is accomplished you
        can go on to the higher teachings. Surely maybe some person is wiser than
        me, more concentrated; he can let it go. If he really can let it go, he
        can also let himself go through a stone wall, as did Milarepa. Milarepa
        practised "let it go" and the Mahamudra very well and then talked with
        scholars about Sunyata. The scholars doubted his mind. He said, I will
        show you. Then he came to a large stone boulder and passed right through
        the big stone and came out. "This is Sunyata" he said. "No, I do not believe
        it" the scholars replied. Then he flew into the sky and sat there. There
        is no place to sit, but he sat there. "This is Sunyata, even the sky has
        no seat but I can sit here." So, he showed them. He really "let it go".
        If you have such power, then you do not just talk and cheat oneself and
        cheat others. In the world there are many ways to cheat, why cheat with
        the Dharma? 
      
        III. Know the Opposite Side
      You must know that the Buddhist doctrines seem to have some contradictory
        teachings. Somewhere it is said you must not kill, somewhere that you must
        kill, somewhere it is mentioned no-mind, no Buddha, somewhere else that
        mind is Buddha, Buddha is the mind; it seems like every teaching resembles
        and contradicts another. To help understand these discrepancies there are
        three pairs of kinds of opposites to be considered. 
      The first pair is: Right and Wrong. To kill is wrong, not to kill is
        right, but Buddha said you must kill your ego. The act of killing may seem
        wrong but to kill ego is quite right. So whether to kill or not to kill
        must be seen according to the Dharma meaning. If you know the Dharma well
        enough you will not mistake the meaning of kill and the right or wrong
        of other Buddhist concepts. 
      The second pair is: Worldly Knowledge and Unworldly Knowledge. The Buddha
        in Tantra gives many kinds of Tantric terms which are not in man's ordinary
        language, but you must carefully know and not mistake these. You must carefully
        be able to distinguish these two kinds of Knowledge. 
      The third pair is: Unfinished Doctrine and Finished Doctrine. What is
        meant by finished doctrine? Finished doctrine means a doctrine very perfectly
        fixed in truth. Unfinished is temporary for the time being because you
        cannot practice the perfect one, so Buddha gave a little less full teaching.
        Hinayana is unfinished doctrine while the Tantra is perfect finished doctrine.
        You can't compare unfinished doctrine against the finished doctrine. For
        example, the Hinayana unfinished doctrine stresses that a woman is very
        troublesome for noivces, so you must keep very far away from them; this
        is unfinished doctrine. In Mahayana, a woman is traditionally our mother
        and sister, you should not keep away. In Vajrayana, a woman is the Dharma
        mother and Dharma wife--a woman must be worshipped for a woman is very
        perfect; this is the finished doctrine. So in the finished doctrine a woman
        is the Dakini, in unfinished doctrine a woman is like the enemy, and in
        half-finished and half-unfinished doctrine a woman is as the Mahayana sister
        or mother. 
      If you are a person who is very lustful, who very easily becomes attached
        to woman, you must take the unfinished doctrine, hold all girls as your
        enemy, and visualize them as skull and bones or skeleton. Before you meet
        a girl you first meditate on her as just bones and then after you meet
        any girl you just hold the thought of your girl of bones so that you see
        any beautiful girl as just skull and bones. Then you will not have attachment. 
      Because you have not finished your attachment, you have to use this
        unfinished doctrine. If you have already finished this attachment, the
        very high position of woman is as Dakini, so you treat her as Dakini and
        you work with her within the Tantric Dharma. At that time you can bring
        up the semen and transform it into light. So you become Buddha and the
        woman also becomes Buddha. This is finished perfect doctrine. 
      The Dharma teachings have such distinctions and opposites: some are
        finished, some are unfinished; some are temporary, some are ultimate; some
        seem right, some seem wrong; some are in this world's language, some are
        in the Buddha's language. So you have to know all of these, then you can
        choose the teaching. 
      For instance, Buddha Gautama taught us to be patient in the Great Nirvana
        Sutra, to kill the enemy of the Dharma and so gain a Vajra Body as he himself
        did. You must choose the doctrine of patience to kill your own enemy of
        ego; but if you meet a Maoist who is an enemy of Dharma, you must kill
        the Maoist in order to save the Dharma. Buddha taught patience for us to
        keep the Dharma but not for us to kill the Dharma in order to make the
        Maoist like you. 
      
        IV. Know the Opportunity
      You must know also about how to take the opportunity and chance to use
        the teaching. I know how to make a divination and when I was living in
        Kalimpong some people asked me for divinations. As I was in a hermitage
        and surely aimed at full Enlightenment, I should not do anything temporary.
        But so many Tibetans came to India and it was a very bad time when war
        with China came that many wanted to know whether they should escape or
        not. At that time I remained in Kalimpong but many Rinpoches had already
        left. Many persons asked me again and I said according to my divination
        the Communists would go back by themselves. They said, "Yes, yes, we believe
        you." At that time His Holiness remained in Sikkim which was closer to
        China. He did also say that the Communists would not come. I knew the Communists
        would go back by themselves as I had a dream; I dreamed that the tiger
        drove away the cat. In Chinese the word "Mao" means Cat, and Tiger is what
        I practice, the Wrathful Padmasambhava who rides a tiger, so my prayers
        will help. About one week later there was a rumour which said that all
        on the Chinese military front were Tibetans. These Tibetans, when they
        come close to India, will rebell. The Chinese learned of this message,
        immediately turned back and so the war was finished. 
      In the case of such a request for divination, if you do not do it, the
        person who asks will feel disappointed and very sad. Since that time many
        Tibetan persons thought my divinations good but I did not charge. I just
        said I did not want too many persons to interrupt my practice. But sometimes
        I must accept the opportunity to give a little help for there is no other
        person to do such things. 
      Once I met a businessman who asked me various questions. He said, "I
        left my home so long ago. Do you think my wife has many boy friends?" I
        said, "This has no need for divination. Ask yourself, if you have one in
        India, she also has one at home; if you have two, she also has two; no
        more or less." He was very ashamed and went away. So we just use the cause
        and effect and he can not say really that I don't know, that I can't give
        divination for such things. So you must also know what opportunities to
        take. 
      There is another story concerning using the chance to choose the teaching.
        In ancient China there were three friends of about the same age. As was
        customary at that time, when some official dies they are given a national
        name to commemorate their passing. These three friends were all given the
        same national name "Ven Doun", which means "Gentle Serious" as all three
        were known for their humility and seriousness. After their death a historian
        wrote down their history. It seems one of these friends became ill and
        was visited by the other two. After wishing the sick one well the friend
        said, "I wonder which one of us will leave this earth first?" The ill man
        replied with his usual seriousness, humility and a bow, "Oh, please, you
        must go first!" He realized that in this case he was not using the chance
        to choose and practice the correct teaching and immediately repented and
        begged his friends forgiveness. 
      
        V. Know Others
      You must know others also, not only know yourself. What does it mean
        to know others? It is just like knowing a horse. Buddha said there are
        four kinds of horses. The first kind of horse begins to run right away,
        when the shadow of the whip is seen, you do not need to even touch him.
        This is the best and fastest kind. The second one, you must touch its hair
        a little and he knows, "Oh, yes, he will hurt me", and then he runs, runs.
        The third kind you must inflict a little pain on his skin and only then
        will he go. The fourth kind of horse will not begin even when you inflict
        pain on his skin, but you have to whip him and even harm his bones, just
        like an elephant whom you must use a hook on and touch his spinal column
        before he will run. Likewise, there are four kinds of persons. The wise
        one who has faith and humility, one you should not talk too much to; you
        just say a little and he will know quite well. The second one, you have
        to talk a little more to, the third one you must even scold, and the fourth
        one you must beat and strike. Marpa toward Milarepa was like the fourth
        kind. This was not because Milarepa was not a good horse, but because he
        had heavy sins from the past. Many think it was only Marpa's wife who was
        very merciful, really a Dakini, while Marpa was very bad. Actually Marpa's
        wife stole some things and gave them to Milarepa for use as present to
        a disciple of Marpa, to help Milarepa get the teachings. This was a sin.
        So we must talk with some people, and do not talk with others; some we
        must give a heavy lesson to. 
      Once a Buddhist Guru came to my place to visit me. He had a disciple
        who followed him so when the Guru came and I asked him to sit down, the
        disciple also sat down. The first to talk must be the teacher, not the
        student, but that disciple was very strong and immediately asked me, "Is
        it true or not: our Guru said you are a disciple of his past life?" I immediately
        said, "You must believe whatever your Guru says, don't ask me. Whatever
        your Guru says is true for you, otherwise he is not your Guru. You shouldn't
        ask me." Actually, I am not his disciple of either a past life or this
        life. This kind of person you cannot fight with by saying "No; why do you
        say like this? you are a Rinpoche and you should not speak a lie." This
        cannot be said. You have to speak just a little, saying the Guru should
        talk the truth and you must believe your Guru's truth, that's enough. So
        this Guru was very ashamed but still he gave me thanks. For the person
        I am very familiar with, I give advice very frankly. I never use the third
        or fourth method, but I am not a Guru. 
      So we must know others very well, then we can choose the manner of talk
        and the teaching. 
      
        VI. Know the Time
      You must also know the time. In India there is a language in which the
        word "chantarpo" has four meanings: the first meaning is salt, the second
        meaning is water, the third meaning is cup; the fourth meaning is horse.
        There was a king who would just say "Chantarpo" and the servant was expected
        to bring that certain thing. To do this he must know the appropriate time.
        When the king was eating something, it meant to bring the salt; when the
        king was washing, it meant to bring water; when the king was drinking and
        called Chantarpo, he brought a cup; and when the king was dressing and
        preparing to go outside, Chantarpo meant to bring the horse. So you must
        recognize the appropriate time and then you can know what to serve at that
        particular time. 
      Our Dharma is also the same. Each time has a different correct application.
        Even though the Dharma itself does not change, you have to use different
        explanations and terms at different times and must have some knowledge
        to distinguish among them. Once I was corresponding with an American musician.
        I emphasized renunciation and he said, "You are Chinese; it is easy for
        you to renounce. For us Americans it is very hard to renounce. Your teachings
        are not for Americans." As time passes, we can change some methods but
        we cannot change the Truth. For example, turning a large prayer wheel can
        now be done by electricity instead of by hand as in Tibet, and we can use
        electricity for light and many technological things for promoting Dharma,
        this is fixed to our time, but we can not make the truth modernized. The
        Truth has no time limitation, the Truth was, is and will be. But to help
        the person of a certain age, you have first to give this and second give
        that, so I think a very important method for the West at this time is the
        Pureland School. It can at least help you get rebirth in Amitabha's Pureland;
        at least it does not utilize vulgar common love as the Vajra Love of Tantra,
        or use the Ch'an as an excuse for laziness as many Hippies do. You should
        not change the Truth fixed in time, but must choose the truth for the time.
        Thus I emphasize the Pureland School as very good because everybody nowadays
        likes laziness, and just wants to do a little practice and you cannot ask
        them to do too much. If you want full Enlightenment, you want to practice
        deligently deep breathing and Samatha; it is very difficult at this time.
        It is better for you to have a little short daily practice and every day
        diligently keep it, repeating "Amitabha, Amitabha,..." becoming as addicted
        to it as to opium. In this way you can use the help of others not just
        the help of oneself. Through helping oneself it is very difficult to succeed;
        it is much easier to get help from others. Amitabha Buddha has 48 vows,
        so to just repeat them fifteen minutes is quite enough and if you can continue
        this daily, Amitabha Buddha might sometime come to you and tell you your
        dying date and then come to invite you to his Pureland. In this way it
        is very easy to succeed. When you escape this world and go to his Pureland,
        there in his Pureland School you can practice the Dharma for full Enlightenment,
        then it will be very easy. If you do evil in the name of Tantra you will
        fall into an animal state, if you practice the Ch'an in laziness, you will
        fall into the animal state as a pig and just harm yourself. So for the
        Kali Age, I emphasize the Pureland School. You can choose a Yidam and repeat
        his Dharma mantra, as "Om Namo Amitabha", and you must keep a simplified
        practice every day like this, just love it as the man loves his new wife
        and continually practice, then there might come a good result. 
      
        VII. Know the Vinayas
      You must also know the different vinayas of Buddhism. There are three
        kinds of vinaya. One is for one's own liberation, the second is to do something
        good and gain merit, and the third is to save others. These vinayas, if
        you compare them, sometimes seem to contradict each other. For example,
        the vinaya of taking refuge says that when you take refuge in the Dharma
        you should not read outsiders' (non-Buddhist) books. This is just for the
        beginners. In the Bodhisattva vows it is said you must read outsiders'
        books such as the Bible and Koran but not more than one-third of the time.
        Why do we need to take time to read outsiders' books? Because you have
        to make contact with and talk with non-Buddhists so you must know their
        doctrines, then you can use your own doctrines to subdue theirs. If you
        do not completely read their books, then you cannot talk fully with them.
        I heard many Christians give lectures and they spoke of this and that.
        I said, "You are so foolish; you have not read enough books." Once a preacher
        said to me, "It is Jesus himself alone who can fly up to heaven. There
        is neither Buddha nor Krishna." "No, you are so foolish; even your own
        Bible said in the Old Testament that Elijah also flew up. Isn't that so?"
  "I did not read the Old Testament." "Oh, but the Old Testament is also
        part of Christianity. The Catholics forbid you to read the Old Testament
        so you only read the Bible of the New Testament and only know about Jesus.
        But the Old Testament speaks of other sages who flew up to heaven before
        Jesus." That is why we need to learn about the scriptures of outsiders.
        The taking refuge vow said we should not read outsiders' books, whereas
        the Bodhisattva vow says we should read them but not more than one-third
        of the time. The other two-thirds of our time we must read Buddhists books
        to keep ourselves strong. Then you can use the outside knowledge to subdue
        others. 
      The Ch'an has no need to read books, but one monk did read books. His
        students came to his house and said, "Oh, you are so clever. You read books
        and teach us it is forbidden to read books. You just make yourself very
        wise while we remain foolish." Then the monk held up the book and said,
  "No, when you read a book you just use your eyes to penetrate even a book
        made of leather and seize on the words, but when I read a book the words
        pass like water and it is just like doing nothing, so never mind. It is
        quite different from when you read books." 
      According to the vinayas there is also what are called unfinished and
        finished vinayas. Unfinished is the Hinayana, finished is the Vajrayana.
        What is their influence? There was once a Hinayana monk who had good meditation
        and kept the vinayas well. When he died and was burnt up, some relics of
        his bones remained and were considered very wonderful things. But when
        this monk was alive he never saw a woman for when a woman came near him
        he just bowed down and closed his eyes. So when his relics were given to
        any woman, the relics just flew away. But a Ch'an monk who was very wise
        said such Hinayana practice caused such a result. Those relics which remain
        cannot be paid respect to by and benefit one-half of the population of
        believers who are women. 
      We must know not only the vinayas of Mahayana but also the vinayas
        of Vajrayana. One of the Bodhisattva vows said that you should not praise
        yourself and blame others. But Buddha himself said many bad things about
        Tipadado who troubled Buddha by throwing stones on his head and doing everything
        to disturb Buddha. Once Buddha was teaching and this Tipadado made his
        own disciple a nun of Buddha. She put a washing pot under her clothes to
        fake a big belly, and then said that Buddha had connected with her and
        made her conceive. But Buddha had a protector who immediately made this
        bowl fall down. Buddha talked quite frankly about all these things. 
      So we must know about these vinayas which sometimes must be kept without
        talking and sometimes must include mention of others. Suppose you are practising
        the Six Paramitas, one of which is Patience. Even though others blame you,
        you must bear it and think that the person whom he talks of is not really
        you; you did not do it, so let him go on. But if you have some good idea
        to say something to teach others, you must do so. Suppose Buddha taught
        his students all about Tipadado, and foretold that Tipadado will fall into
        hell, and afterwards you learn that all of these did happen. Knowing this
        would make others refrain from committing sins. If you only say, "Oh, I
        will contain it; no need to speak about this to others," then you cannot
        teach others about cause and effect. Buddha also said Maitreya's diligence
        is not as great as his own. According to the old tradition, the Maitreya
        Buddha should come before Gautama Buddha but because of Sakyamuni's diligence,
        he jumped to come before Maitreya. This kind of thing seems to be praising
        oneself but if Buddha did not teach about this, he could not teach about
        diligence. So for teaching sometimes he can do like this, but this is the
        truth, he never lies. Even to teach others you should not lie; if it is
        the truth you have to speak out. So sometimes I speak about this and that,
        as saying that I do not open a shop to sell the Dharma, but whenever a
        person asks me about this and that I have to compare the two sides and
        make some choices. If what you talk about is not a lie but the truth and
        can help the person to choose the right teaching, it is a merit and does
        not break the vinaya. 
      To really keep the vinaya, we must know all the vinayas very well. The
        Buddha gave a vinaya that a Bhiksu should not hold money. One of Buddha's
        disciples held much money and came to see Buddha. The other Bhiksus say,
  "You'd better not go to Buddha; we hold a little money and he forbids it;
        you hold so much, you shouldn't go; you will be punished. No! No!" Then
        he went to Buddha. Buddha blessed him and said, "Oh, this disciple keeps
        the vinaya very well. He keeps the vinaya vividly alive not as a dead word
        because this money is not for himself, but he brings it to me from his
        sponsor for the monastery; the money passes through his hands but he does
        not get any for himself." Buddha gave such praise but many disciples said,
  "Wonderful! If we have a copper coin you say it is forbidden but he has
        so much and you say this is different." "Yes, he transmits money to me
        for the foundation of a monastery, not for himself." Nowadays in Thailand
        the Buddhist monks think they keep this vinaya because they don't accept
        money with their hands but with chopsticks, but this is still breaking
        the vinaya. So if you do not recognize the meaning and spirit of the vinayas
        very well, you will fall. 
      
        VIII. The Four Dependencies
      There is a very good set of principles called the Four Dependencies
        which can help us to choose the right teaching. First, we depend upon the
        Dharma but not depend upon a person. Some people seem to have a high position
        as Gandhi or Nehru, but we must believe and choose the Dharma and not believe
        in a personality. Don't say this person is a Rinpoche, this one a Tulku,
        that a layman just like me, but we must choose according to the Dharma,
        not according to a name. You must know if this Rinpoche really learned
        a lot of Tantra or read the Tripitaka many times or entered into a three-year
        retreat many times or practiced on a mountain alone for many years; you
        must choose by his Dharma practice, not his personality or name. This is
        the first principle. 
      The second principle is that you must depend upon meaning, not the word.
        From words you can sometimes get different meanings, so you must choose
        the exact, best meaning fixed with the Truth. Do not choose according to
        the word, thinking this word is from this book, that word is from such
        a book, but you must choose according to the meaning. The meaning is the
        word's very essential part. If you do not choose meaning but just choose
        the word which superficially gives some explanation, this can easily be
        wrong. Choose the meaning which is fixed with the Dharma or the Truth.
        This is the second principle. 
      The third principle is to depend upon the finished doctrine and not
        the unfinished doctrine. You know the unfinished doctrines has its own
        time to be practiced, but for your right view you must choose the perfectly
        finished one whose perfect meaning touches the truth. The unfinished meaning
        does not touch the truth but has some temporary function. 
      The fourth principle is to depend on wisdom not consciousness. Choose
        wisdom over thought and consciousness. Dreams are mostly from thoughts
        not from wisdom, so don't believe in all dreams although some dreams may
        be your teacher and are inspired and come from wisdom. From wisdom you
        can get close to the final truth and the Dharma. Wisdom and Consciousness
        are quite different. Consciousness is the thought of every knowledge. Science
        is from consciousness. Buddhists also have consciousness but Buddhism transforms
        the knowledge of consciousness into Wisdom. When we say Wisdom we mean
        the Buddha's wisdom, the five wisdom. We should choose the fixed wisdom
        but not the knowledge of consciousness. Many sciences flourish only from
        consciousness, so they are changeable, they have to be advanced, they have
        to be changed over and over again. That is why many new sciences replace
        the old sciences. They are from the knowledge of consciousness as all worldly
        things and all worldly books. All worldly thoughts are from consciousness;
        but all the Dharma is from Buddha's wisdom. 
      Buddha achieved full Enlightenment; he touched the Truth and what he
        said is from the Truth itself. This is the unworldly wisdom; the unworldly
        wisdom is the Dharma. So from Dharma I started; with Dharma I end this
        talk. So please choose the Buddhist wisdom but not worldly knowledge. These
        are four important principles. Thank you. 
      
      
        Appendix of Booklet No. 55
      
      
        Questions about Dreams Answered: 
          Habitual and Inspired Dreams
      
      
        Everybody has dreams but dreams can be of different kinds. The habitual
        dream comes from whatever you do during the daytime which will affect your
        dreams at night. This kind of dream is not important and is just a delusion.
        You have a girl and have sexual intercourse in a dream, this is just the
        continuation of your bad thoughts and actions during the day. If the sage
        who has never committed adultery has a dream of some girl and has sexual
        intercourse, then this kind of dream to him is a very good realization.
        This means he will be identified with the Dakini and with the Truth. Because
        he never has such thoughts in the daytime, he would not have such a habitual
        dream, so such a dream must be inspired by the Dakini. But the same dream
        to a person who thinks about sexual intercourse daily is proof that after
        you die you continue to think of sex, sex, sex, and so you become an animal.
        If you want to kill the husband of a girl and take her as your own wife,
        this kind of sexual desire and intention of killing will lend you to dream
        accordingly and cause you not just to fall into the animal realm, but to
        fall into Hell . But if a man who is very kind and never thinks of shooting
        and has never had a thought of a gun, shoots someone in a dream, this is
        very good, for him to shoot somebody means that he saves somebody. In such
        a way the same dream may have different explanations. 
      The habitual dream is one thing and is of no importance; Don't pay any
        attention to it. The inspired dream is very good, but how to say that this
        is inspired and this is from habit? The inspired dream must have the Cause;
        that means that suppose during the daytime you meditate in Samadhi or you
        practice Samatha. Then in the nighttime you will have Samatha and you may
        dream that somebody talks with you and tells you don't do this and do that.
        This may be a teaching dream. This is an inspired dream. 
      There are also so-called relative dreams. A relative dream is one that
        is not about yourself but related to your family or to your nation or to
        your people. I have published a booklet on dreams in which I mentioned
        how a Hindu Guru and Buddha explained the same dream. A king had a dream
        and he told it to his Hindu Guru. The Hindu Guru said you must kill this
        and kill that and then you will be without such a bad dream. The king then
        talked to the Buddha. The Buddha said, "No, this is not related to yourself
        but as you are a king and the things in your dream occurred in the future,
        I tell you that these things will happen to your country after many many
        years in the future." This kind of dream is a relative dream. I had a servant
        who helped me in my hermitage for more than fifteen years. During the daytime
        he sold his dumplings and at mealtime he took about half an hour to prepare
        my food. He dreamed one night that I flew on a white horse in the sky.
        I asked him what direction did I fly. He said first I went to the East,
        and then to the West. I asked if I flew alone or with a girl or boy. He
        said, you flew with a girl; and what was her age, he said about 20 years
        old. This was Varya who helped me to come to the West and her age at that
        time was about 20. This dream was not convenient to be inspired in my dreams,
        but due to my servant's faith and his very careful service, the Buddha
        arranged it in his dream and let him tell me. This is called a relative
        dream; nothing good for him, nothing bad for him. 
      Some dreams are inspired by practice; some dreams are inspired by your
        habit. The habitual dream you must put aside. You should just reflect within
        yourself about this kind of dream, asking yourself if you have such an
        action in the daytime, and then if you say, Oh, yes, I often do such things,
        then this is a habitual dream and counts as nothing. If it is a bad habit,
        you must change the bad habit of the daytime and then in the nighttime
        the bad dream will be no more. The inspired dream is just from your practice.
        If you really practice diligently, then your dreams will be inspired and
        many truths can be gotten from them. When you get a teaching dream, you
        will understand it yourself due to your practice and there will be no need
        for anyone else to explain it to you. 
      There is also a Bodhisattva dream. If you want to be a Bodhisattva and
        you develop all the Bodhicitta, you may also have a good dream related
        to this. Most of these dreams are dreams of the moon as the moon is a symbol
        of the Great Compassion. Most of these dreams have you helping others.
        Sometimes you are just as a boatman who moves a boat, this means you can
        save others. This is a Bodhisattva dream. 
      Flying is a good dream because the energy comes up. To fall down in
        a dream is good or bad according to what kind of fall. If you fall down
        and get some pain and fear, this is bad. If you fall with a parachute,
        this kind of fall is good. Flying must be a good dream because the inner
        energy goes out. If you fly in a dream and remember "Oh, I just fly and
        take the chance to go to Sukhavati to meet Amitabha;" this is also possible. 
      In everything the Cause is very important. If you want a good dream
        you must have good cause. If your practice is good, the dream will be good.
        When the dream is bad, don't pay any attention to it. But the inspired
        dream may give you some teaching and this you must take heed of. 
      A dream may also influence your action in the daytime. For example,
        you may dream that you shot and killed somebody. This can not be said to
        be a habit dream as there is no such fact, but you have the habit of anger
        and store and keep it inside. Because you have such a dream and your anger
        continues as a conception, it may come out in the daytime, and in the daytime
        some other cause may occur which brings out your anger. In such a way there
        is a cycle between the daytime and nighttime actions. 
      
      [Home][Back to main list][Back to Chenian][Go to Dr. Lin's works]